Monday, March 26, 2012

Character Analysis: Mr. Tulkinghorn


After our class exercise today, I would like to focus in on a character that although we have not paid him much attention so far in our discussions, is an interesting and integral character to Dickens world of Bleak House: Mr. Tulkinghorn. Although he at first seems to be someone we can trust, as he is friends with the Deadlocks whom despite their abundant affluence, seem to be still genuinely good people. However, we learn that Tulkinghorn can and will use anything and anyone to gain advantage, such as using Jo for information and acquiring the letters that belonged to Lady Deadlock and Captain Hawdon to keep Lady Deadlock in silence. He is one of the most corrupt in my mind because his flaws are plentiful. He is a user, deceiver, schemer, prier, money seeker and lender, retracts his word and the list goes on. However, the actual reasons behind his flaws are not always clear. We do not know much about his childhood or early life and so cannot use that as an excuse as to the cause of his flaws. However, I would say that much of the influence on his flaws is for personal gain, especially for material wealth and/or favors from others through learning information to use against others, like threatening Lady Deadlock with information about Esther in order to keep her silenced. In addition, he is a lawyer for the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case so his motives are always ulterior and for his own gain. In considering whether or not he is a sympathetic character there is not really much to consider. There is not a single redeeming quality about him and I feel that this is a unanimous view of his character.
When we look at the larger picture of what Dickens is trying to show us through Tulkinghorn, I believe there are several concepts at work. First, Dickens is showing us the corruption of the legal system with Tulkinghorn being a prime example from the Jarndyce case. In addition, I think Tulkinghorn is definitely one of the characters that embodies all the wrong qualities of human nature: lying, cheating, using, etc with Skimpole’s flaws being another example from the story. In addition, Dickens is showing us what power, influence and money can not only do to someone but how these things entitle and enable people to control others. Dickens criticism of those with money is biting and harsh in that like others in the story, Tulkinghorn is corrupted by power and greed which is in harsh contrast to characters like say poor little Jo and Jenny who have no one and nothing and do not really fit anywhere in the class divide. In addition, combined with his actions, Tulkinghorn has a very disagreeable personality. His temperament is harsh and his loyalty lays with no one, not even his old and trusted friends the Deadlocks. He uses their trust in him to his advantage and knows that he can manipulate people through this covenant of secrecy and trust.   

4 comments:

  1. I agree with this completely and I think that he is the least looked at character because he seems like the most normal one int he novel sort of. He is everywhere but he is doing things or appears to be doing things that seem so normal why would we pay any attention to him? It's so hard to tell when he is loyal and when he's not unless you look at him completely at one time, not a chapter or so at a time and that's the only way I was able to agree with this is by looking at him altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with your statements of him being overlooked. He is quite a character, the way he becomes involved in everyone’s business. I like that you pointed out the fact that with his status, he feels like he is entitled to control others. His past remaining a mystery also adds to his character as being untrustworthy. Whereas anyone else’s past being a mystery might just be swept aside, the fact that he is such a sketchy liar and evil guy makes us wonder what he is hiding. It is also interesting to see how he interacts with different characters. We feel that we can trust him in the beginning of the novel as the lawyer and document carrier for the Dedlocks, but we figure it out that he’s just a leech and creep.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He seems to take such a strange pleasure in holding secrets and power over others. Do you think he acts out of class anxiety or jealousy? He's important to the Dedlocks, but he isn't family and won't ever be. It seems to give him pleasure to be able to control Lady D.

    ReplyDelete
  4. On parting company with Esther, Lady Dedlock should have penned a brief note to Sir Leicester about her daughter, mentioning that Tulkinghorn was probing her past with a view to her total discredit. Hortense ( Mme Defarge) knowing nothing of this would have shot Tulkinghorn & gone to the gallows in early course. And Chesney Wold would no longer be such an "infernal ol' jail".

    ReplyDelete